EPISTEMOLOGI PARADIGMA DAN TRANSFORMASI ILMU PENGETAHUAN THOMAS KUHN

Authors

  • M. Dwi Rahman Sahbana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v8i1.188

Keywords:

Paradigms, Thomas Kuhn, Transformation of Science

Abstract

This research was born based on the thinking of Thomas Kuhn with the concept of scientific revolution with the characteristics of new thinking and philosophical models in terms of the history of the birth of science and the philosophy of science. The research method that the author uses is a qualitative method with a library research approach. The data collection technique in this study is a documentation technique, namely by collecting important data and files that support research activities. The result of this research is that for Thomas Kuhn the history of science is a starting point in studying fundamental problems in scientific epistemology, because science is basically always marked by the strength of the paradigm and the subsequent scientific revolution. This phase is what Thomas Kuhn termed the historical phase of the birth of new science, starting with normal science, then anomaly and crisis occurred, after which the scientific revolution emerged as a form of the birth of new science. Thomas Kuhn's thoughts can be contextualized with the development of Islamic scholarship with the aim of building openness of Islamic thought to anomalies and crises as well as the emergence of a revolution in Islamic science so as to motivate the emergence of a new paradigm in the realm of Islamic scholarship

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Amin. 1996. Studi Agama: Normativitas atau Historisitas?. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Alif, Muhammad. 2021. “Eksistensi Tuhan dan Problem Epistemologi dalam Filsafat Agama.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam 12 (2): 209–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v12i2.2108.

Anas, Mohamad. 2021. “Disruption and Incommensurability Among Thomas S. Kuhn’s Paradigms.” KALAM 15 (1): 103–20. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v15i1.7380.

Digarizki, Iftahul, dan Arif Al Anang. 2020. “Epistemologi Thomas S. Kuhn: Kajian Teori Pergeseran Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah.” Jurnal Humanitas 7 (1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v7i1.3285.

Effendi, Rahmat. 2020. “Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn: Perubahan Paradigma dan Implikasi dalam Bangunan Ilmu Keislaman.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman dan Ushuluddin 23 (1): 47–61.

Farid, Edi Kurniawan. 2021. “Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S. Kuhn Serta Relevansinya dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam 19 (1): 81–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/klm.v19i1.6367.

Kesuma, Ulfa dan Ahmad Wahyu Hidayat. 2020. “Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma.” Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 166–87. 10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043.

Komarudin, Komarudin. 2021. “Pradigma dan Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan Perspektif Thomas Kuhn.” YASIN 1 (2): 321–35. https://doi.org/10.36088/yasin.v1i2.131.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Leiden: Instituut Voor Theoretische Biologie.

Kurniawan, Rofiq dan Yudi Ardian Rahman. 2021. “Revolusi Ilmiah Membedah Paradigma Sains Perspektif Thomas Khun.” Tsaqofah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 5 (1). https://jurnal.stitalishlahbondowoso.ac.id/index.php/tsaqofah/article/view/76.

Malau, Ebita. 2021. “Kajian Deskriptif Tentang Pembelajaran Pasca Pandemi dalam Paradigma Keilmuan.” Lentera: Jurnal Kajian Bidang Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran 1 (2): 30–34. https://journal.actual-insight.com/index.php/lentera/article/view/422.

Mamnunah, Mamnunah dan Sufyan Sauri. 2020. “Relevansi Pemikiran Thomas Khun Terhadap Penerapan Ijma’.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam 11 (1): 74–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v11i1.2642.

Maulana, Abdullah Muslich Rizal, Muhammad Faqih Nidzom, Achmad Reza Hutama Al Faruqi, dan Choirul Ahmad. 2021. “Reconsidering Manifestation and Significances of Islamic Philosophy.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam 12 (1): 25–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v12i1.3633.

Nasution, Harun. 1982. Akal dan Wahyu dalam Islam. Jakarta: UI Press.

Putri, Endrika Widdia, Lingga Yuwana, dan Muh Bahrul Afif. 2020. “Epistemology of Thomas S. Kuhn’s Shifting Paradigm and Its Relevance to Islamic Science.” Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education 4 (1): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v4i1.48.

Putri, Fia Alifah, dan Wahyu Iskandar. 2020. “Paradigma Thomas Kuhn: Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pendidikan.” Nizhamiyah 10 (2): 94-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/niz.v10i2.779.

Rahman, Fazlur. 1987. Neo Modernisme Islam. Bandung: Mizan.

Rahman, Taufik. 2021. “Paradigma Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya Terhadap Perkembangan Keilmuan Islam di Indonesia.” JURNAL AL-AQIDAH 13 (1): 46–60.

Rosyid, Abdul. 2020. “Pergeseran Paradigma Agama dan Sains di Tengah Pandemi Covid dalam Kaca Mata Thomas Kuhn.” Asketik: Jurnal Agama & Perubahan Sosial 4 (2): 234–54. https://doi.org/10.30762/ask.v4i2.2415.

Solihin, Jamaludin. 2021. “Transisi Pudarnya Pandemi Covid-19: Dari Masa Normal Baru Ke Masa Normal Normal dalam Paradigma Keilmuan.” Rhizome: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Humaniora 1 (5): 12-17. https://journal.actualinsight.com/index.php/rhizome/article/view/463.

Vilmala, Berry Kurnia. 2020. “Revolusi Saintifik dalam Perkembangan Mekanika.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 3 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v3i1.22293.

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Sahbana, M. D. R. (2022). EPISTEMOLOGI PARADIGMA DAN TRANSFORMASI ILMU PENGETAHUAN THOMAS KUHN. Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 8(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v8i1.188