Reconceptualizing Context and Audience in Qur’anic Discourse
A Modern Linguistic Analysis of Q.S. Al-Muṭaffifīn [83]: 1–6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v9i1.706Keywords:
Asymmetrical Entitlement, Audience Reception, Contextual Interpretation, Qur’anic Linguistics, TaṭfīfAbstract
Contextual Qur’anic interpretation faces the challenge of relating the historical meaning of a text to contemporary ethical issues without disregarding its original significance. This challenge is evident in the interpretation of taṭfīf in Q.S. Al-Muṭaffifīn [83]: 1–6, which historically concerns fraudulent measurement and weighing but also presents an ethical pattern involving the fulfillment of entitlements in exchange relationships. Previous studies have examined taṭfīf in relation to commercial ethics and contextual interpretation, yet the analytical relationship between its specific meaning and contemporary ethical application requires further clarification. This study develops an interpretive framework integrating textual context, historical context, and audience-oriented interpretation. It employs qualitative library research and contextual textual analysis of the relevant Qur’anic verses, classical exegetical works, and literature on linguistics and hermeneutics. The analysis examines the passage’s internal structure, its historical context, the audience’s role in constructing understanding, and the conditions for contemporary ethical application. The findings indicate that the contrast between yastawfūn and yukhsirūn represents an asymmetry in the fulfillment of entitlements, while historical contextualization confirms that the primary meaning of taṭfīf remains associated with deficient measurement and weighing. Building on this distinction, the study proposes asymmetrical entitlement as an analytical concept describing a situation in which one party demands full fulfillment of its own entitlement while diminishing another party’s legitimate due. Its application is governed by four criteria: legitimate entitlement, a reciprocal relationship, unequal standards, and an advantage obtained by reducing another party’s due. This study offers a framework for extending the ethical relevance of Qur’anic discourse through contextual interpretation while distinguishing contemporary ethical analogy from the original lexical meaning of taṭfīf.
Downloads
References
Abd, Raghad Jihad. 2026. “The Impact of the Reader’s Culture on the Production of Linguistic Meaning in Light of Reception Theory: Juz’ ‘Amma as a Model.” Journal of Babylon Center for Humanities Studies 16 (4): 151–64. https://doi.org/10.66026/p2yh8038.
Abou-Bakr, Omaima Mostafa. 2023. “The Egalitarian Principle of ‘Qist’ as Lived Ethic: Towards a Liberational Tafsir.” Religions 14 (9): 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091087.
Adam, Sambo. 2026. “Sūrat Al-Muṭaffifīn and Business Ethics: A Study of Business Transactions Among Muslim Traders in Ilorin.” IJUS: International Journal of Umranic Studies 9 (2): 1–15.
Alfian, Ian, Azhari Akmal Tarigan, Rahmi Syahreza, and Ahmad Riyansyah Parinduri. 2024. “Economic Welfare on Justice, Faith and Blessing Based on the Qur’anic Perspective.” Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam 6 (2): 190–203. https://doi.org/10.24239/jiebi.v6i2.313.190-203.
Altamtamami, Ahmed bin Obaid. 2025. “The Style of Choice and its Impact on Understanding the Qur’anic Text: Surah Al-Mutaffifin as a Model ‘Verses 1-4.’” Ḥawliyyatu Kulliyyati al-Lughati al-‘Arabiyyati bi-Jirjā 29 (3): 1512–53.
Ālūsī, Shihāb al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-. 1994. Rūḥ al-Ma‘ānī fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm wa al-Sab‘ al-Mathānī. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Alwi, Zulfahmi, Rika Dwi Ayu Parmitasari, and Alim Syariati. 2021. “An Assessment on Islamic Banking Ethics through Some Salient Points in the Prophetic Tradition.” Heliyon 7 (5): e07103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07103.
Anisa, Mohammad Umar Said, Singgih Prayogo, Luqman Abdul Jabbar, and Jimmy Malintang. 2026. “Studi Komparasi: Tafsir Klasik Turjuman Al-Mustafid As-Singkili dan Tafsir Modern Al-Azhar Buya Hamka (Kajian Mufasir Kawasan Asia Tenggara).” Qolamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam 11 (2): 214–32. https://doi.org/10.55120/qolamuna.v11i02.2482.
‘Āshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir Ibn. 1984. Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nashr.
Asna, Lathifatul, and Nasihun Amin. 2022. “Hermeneutics of Reception by Hans Robert Jauss: An Alternative Approach Toward Quranic Studies.” International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum al-Din 24 (2): 160–71. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.24.2.13092.
Baaly, Ali Sajjad. 2025. “Contemporary Epistemology of Interpretation: Reconstructing the Relationship between Normative Values and Historicity in the Interpretation of the Qur’an.” AL QUDS: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 9 (3): 633–46. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v9i3.15718.
Bushra, Mariam, and Shahzadi Pakeeza. 2022. “Contextual Qur’anic Interpretation and Islamic Tradition of Ijtihad.” International Research Journal on Islamic Studies 4 (2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.54262/irjis.04.02.e01.
Calis, Halim. 2022. “The Theoretical Foundations of Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an in Islamic Theological Schools and Philosophical Sufism.” Religions 13 (2): 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188.
Demir, Abdullah. 2024. “Mü’teffifîn Suresi’nin İlk Üç Ayeti Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” Journal of Quranic Studies and Modern Science 5 (10): 1–8.
Dror, Yehudit, Salam Saied, and Bayan Amara. 2024. “The Grammar of Emotion Verbs in the Qur’ān: A Case Study of the Verb Xāfa.” Journal of Semitic Studies 69 (2): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgae021.
Fadilah, Adi. 2019. “Ma’na-Cum-Maghza Sebagai Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Perkembangan Wacana Hermeneutika Alquran di Indonesia.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 8 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v8i1.13383.
Fadoli, Ach, Sakinah Naziha, and Wasik. 2022. “Reception of the Qur’an on Social Media: Case Study of Qur’an Interpretation on the Instagram Account @quranreview.” WARAQAT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 7 (2): 150–59. https://doi.org/10.51590/waraqat.v7i2.338.
Fattahizadeh, Fathyieh, and Fereshteh Motamad Langrodi. 2022. “Application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Model to Quranic Verses Discussing Peaceful Dealing with Hypocrites.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12 (1): 184–200. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.121.13.
Firdaus, Nazilatul Fatihah, and Husein Aziz. 2026. “Work Ethic, Amanah, and Integrity in the Qur’an: Constructing an Integrative Ethical Framework.” Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 5 (1): 279–96. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v5i1.749.
Geovani, Jefri, and Tera Saputra. 2023. “Social Justice and the Qur’anic Perspective: A Study of the Social Implications of the Qur’anic Verses.” Al - Mujaddid: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agama 5 (1): 12–30. https://doi.org/10.51482/almujaddid.v5i1.113.
Ghozali, Mahbub, and Matsna Afwi Nadia. 2023. “Exploring Textuality and Reader Orientation: Unveiling Interpretative Tendencies in Understanding Nafs Wahidah in QS. Al-Nisa of the Qur’an.” TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 8 (2): 191–207. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i2.20339.
Haleem, M. A. S. Abdel. 2018. “The Role of Context in Interpreting and Translating the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 20 (1): 44–66.
Has, Muhammad Hasdin, Aminudin Aminudin, and Faisal Saleh Julian Saputra. 2026. “Taṭfīf dan Mislabelling dalam Perdagangan Modern: Analisis Maʿnā-Cum-Maghzā Qs. Al-Muṭaffifīn [83]:1–6.” El-Maqra’: Tafsir, Hadis dan Teologi 6 (1): 151–63. https://doi.org/10.31332/elmaqra.v6i1.14085.
Hatta, Muhammad. 2023. “Abdullah Saeed’s Contextual Restructures of the Qur’an.” International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities 2 (1): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.56.
Ichwan, Moh Nor, and Auwal Salisu. 2024. “Reevaluating Qur’anic Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis Between Classical Tafsir and Modern Hermeneutical Approaches.” Kalam 18 (2): 107–26. https://doi.org/10.24042/kalam.v18i2.24213.
Kadir, Najib Abdul, Mohd Akil Muhamed Ali, Mohd Farhan Md Ariffin, and Abur Hamdi Usman. 2022. “The Rules of Interpretation: Review on Asbab Al-Nuzul in Tafsir Al-Mishbah.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 12 (6): 1464–75. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i6/13322.
Kanwal, Saliha, and Hafiz Fahad Aziz. 2025. “Scripture and Society: Quranic Ethics in the Age of Globalization.” Advance Social Science Archive Journal 4 (1): 432–43.
Kathīr, Ismā‘īl ibn ‘Umar Ibn. 1998. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Edited by Muḥammad Ḥusayn Shams al-Dīn. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Kerwanto, Kerwanto, Muhammad Aulal Fikri Al Hasani, and Muhammad Miftah Hamdani. 2024. “Contextual Interpretation (Study of Epistemology, History, Variety of Books and Examples of Interpretation).” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 3 (3): 451–70. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v3i3.5737.
Khodijah, Siti, and Suqiyah Musafa’ah. 2025. “Recontextualizing Asbāb Al-Nuzūl: From Micro-Historical Triggers to Macro-Ethical Frameworks within the Qur’anic Hierarchy of Values.” Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies 4 (1): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.51214/biis.v4i1.1384.
Khoirudin, Khoirudin, and Adnan Azzaki. 2024. “Perspective of Quranic Verses of Business Ethics on Justice and Honesty in Trade.” Journal of Halal Industry Studies 3 (2): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.53088/jhis.v3i2.1396.
Kurniawan, Rachmad Risqy, and Kinanti Dwi Purnama. 2023. “Dampak Kecurangan dalam Jual Beli Menurut Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 3 (1): 57–71.
Lahna, Abdul Ilah Ait. 2020. “Hidāyāt Sūrah Al-Muṭaffifīn: Dirāsah Taṭbiqiyyah.” QURANICA - International Journal of Quranic Research 12 (1): 309–40. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol12no1.19.
Lokman, Ainul Asyraf. 2025. “Pendekatan Sejarah Terhadap Pentafsiran Al-Quran: Memahami Wahyu Dalam Konteks Peradaban Kontemporari Historical Approach to the Interpretation of the Quran: Understanding Revelation in the Context of Contemporary Civilization.” Al-Muqaddimah: Online Journal of Islamic History and Civilization 13 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22452/muqaddimah.vol13no2.1.
Lyons, John, ed. 1995. “Text and Discourse; Context and Co-Text.” In Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511810213.010.
Maghribi, Hamdan, and Alfina Hidayah. 2023. “Contesting the Exegetical Approaches of Muhammad Abduh and Fazlur Rahman to the Qur’ān.” Religia 26 (1): 40–57. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v26i1.865.
Mao, Tiaoyuan, and Shanhua He. 2021. “An Integrated Approach to Pragmatic Competence: Its Framework and Properties.” Sage Open 11 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472.
Maulana, Achmad Ilham, and Nurul Ani Safitri. 2025. “Prinsip Bisnis Qur’ani dalam Jual Beli: Tinjauan Tafsir al-Munir QS Al-Baqarah dan Al-Mutaffifin: Qur’anic Business Principles in Trade: A Study of al-Munir’s Interpretation of Surah Al-Baqarah and Al-Mutaffifin.” Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy 7 (4): 251–65.
Muhyin, Nabila Fajriyanti. 2023. “The Concepts of Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an Abdullah Saeed.” Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran 6 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v6i1.289.
Mujaddid, Nabil Shawab al-, Azhari Akmal Tarigan, and Muhammad Ramadhan. 2022. “Traders Perception and Behavior in Weighing (in Terms of Q.S. Al-Muthaffifin).” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8 (2): 1479–88. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i2.5428.
Mulyany, Ratna, and Hafas Furqani. 2019. “Sharing Prosperity: Distributive Justice Framework in an Islamic Moral Economy.” Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 23 (2): 117–26. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v23i2.6285.
Musfiroh, Mayadina Rohmi, and Sahiron Syamsuddin. 2020. “Contextualization of Qiwamah Meaning: Reflection on Abdullah Saeed, Application and Consistency.” PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender 13 (2): 321–36. https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v13i2.7191.
Nuraini, Nuraini, Waharjani Waharjani, and Mohammad Jailani. 2024. “From Textual to Contextual: Contemporary Islamic Thinker Abdullah Saeed on Qur’anic Exegesis.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur’an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif 21 (1): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v21i1.19639.
Osaimi, Mentioning of the Righteous and the Wicked in Surat Al-Mutaffifin in the Quran; An Analytical Rhetorical Study Authors Meshal Fehan Ballash Al-. 2023. “Mentioning of the Righteous and the Wicked in Surat Al-Mutaffifin in the Quran; An Analytical Rhetorical Study.” Al-Majallatu al-‘Arabiyyatu li al-‘Ulūmi wa Nashri al-Abḥāth 9 (2): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.l040722.
Qurṭubī, Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-. 2006. Al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Edited by ‘Abd Allāh ibn ‘Abd al-Muḥsin al-Turkī. Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
Reinhart, A. Kevin. 2017. “What We Know about Maʿrūf.” Journal of Islamic Ethics 1 (1–2): 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340004.
Rezwandi, Rezwandi. 2025. “The Algorithm of Tafsīr: Characteristics of Content and Patterns of Audience Reception in the Case of @anugerahwulandari.” Izzatuna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 6 (2): 73–100. https://doi.org/10.62109/ijiat.v6i2.203.
Ridho, Hilmi, Afif Sabil, Mohammad Firmansyah, Febri Hijroh Mukhlis, and Aizat Khairi. 2025. “Interpretation of the Qur’an from Classical-Textual to Contemporary-Contextual; An Approach Proposed by Muslim Scholars.” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 4 (2): 645–74. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i2.12593.
Ritonga, Miftahul Janna, and Khairunnas Jamal. 2025. “Etika Bisnis dalam Al-Qur’an Kajian Tafsir Atas Ayat-Ayat Tentang Keadilan dan Kejujuran dalam Perdagangan.” Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah 10 (1): 325–32. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v10i1.25102.
Rois, Choirur, Muchlis Muchlis, Agus Irfan, Hairul Anam, and Rusdi Rusdi. 2025. “Islamic Hierarchy of Value: Abdullah Saeed’s Progressive Interpretation of the Qur’an.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 49 (1): 205–21. Purposive sampling. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1125.
Rosidin, Khulafaur, and Ahmad Solahuddin. 2025. “Ribā in the Qur’an and the Bible: Comparative Legal-Ethical Perspectives on Economic Justice.” Az-Zarqa’: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam 17 (1): 124–47. https://doi.org/10.14421/az-zarqa.v17.i1.4537.
Ṣābūnī, Muḥammad ‘Alī al-. 1981. Ṣafwat al-Tafāsīr. Dār al-Qur’ān al-Karīm.
Saeed, Abdullah. 2006. Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. Routledge.
Saeed, Abdullah. 2014. Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First Century: A Contextualist Approach. Routledge.
Saeed, Abdullah, and Ali Akbar. 2021. “Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’ān.” Religions 12 (7): 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527.
Saefudin, Ahmad, Ahmad Rafiq, and Marhumah Marhumah. 2021. “The Anatomy of Ingrid Mattson’s Interpretation of the Qur’an: History, Authority, and Translation Problems.” AL QUDS: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 5 (1): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2300.
Safei, Abdullah. 2026. “Beyond Interpretation: Reception Theory and the Transformation of Qur’anic Meaning Across Cultures.” Quranic Cultures: Text, Reception, and Society 1 (1): 42–59.
Sambo, Adam. 2025. “Thematic Study of Suratul-Muṭaffifin, with Particular Reference to Business Transactions among Muslim Traders in Ilorin.” Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 3 (3): 111–19. https://doi.org/10.58723/ijfis.v3i3.549.
Satria, Tomi, Duski Samad, and Firdaus ST Mamad. 2025. “Pendekatan Hermeneutika Kontekstual dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Kajian Kritis Terhadap Metodologi Fazlur Rahman dan Abdullah Saeed.” AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora 6 (1): 1143–52. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v6i1.8460.
Savage, Scott V., Peter J. Burke, Jan E. Stets, and Phoenicia Fares. 2019. “The Fairness Identity and the Emergence of Inequality.” Social Science Research 81 (July): 144–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.03.010.
Shorbagy, Alsayed Abdel Halim Mustafa Abdel Aal al-. 2021. “Intentionality, Context, and the Pragmatic Dimension in Understanding the Qur’anic Discourse.” Ḥawliyyatu Kulliyyati al-Lughati al-‘Arabiyyati bi-Jirjā 25 (9): 8848–914.
Siregar, Pani Akhiruddin, Sufitri Liana, and Suryani Suryani. 2025. “Fraud in Trade Measurements and Weights from the Perspective of Sharia Economic Law.” Al-Mustashfa: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 10 (2): 568–86. https://doi.org/10.24235/jm.v10i2.20931.
Suhada. 2020. “Latar Sosial Ekonomi Periode Mekah dalam Al-Quran.” Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur’an 20 (2): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.53828/33aqtx16.
Ṭabarī, Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-. 1994. Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī min Kitābihi Jāmi‘ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2021. “Pragmatics as an Interdisciplinary Field.” Journal of Pragmatics, (Im)politeness, humour, and the role of intentions: Essays presented to Michael Haugh, vol. 179 (July): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.015.
Thabari, Abu Ja'far Muhammad bin Jarir Ath-. 2007. Tafsir Ath-Thabari. Pustaka Azzam.
Tolan, John, and Houari Touati. 2024. “Aspects of the Reception of the Qur’an in Modern Europe.” Studia Islamica 119 (2): 235–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341497.
Wāḥidī, Abū al-Ḥasan ‘Alī ibn Aḥmad al-Naysābūrī al-. 1992. Asbāb al-Nuzūl. Dār al-Iṣlāḥ.
Wijaya, Aksin, and Shofiyullah Muzammil. 2021. “Maqāṣidi Tafsir: Uncovering and Presenting Maqāṣid Ilāhī-Qur’anī into Contemporary Context.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 59 (2): 449–78. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.449-478.
Yunus, Mukhtar. 2026. “Qur’anic Economic Interpretation Using a Thematic Exegesis Approach to Address the Rise of Digital Fraud and Cybercrime on Social Media.” Journal Analytica Islamica 13 (2): 479–90. https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v13i2.30804.
Zac, Amit, Yu-Chun Huang, Amédée von Moltke, Christopher Decker, and Ariel Ezrachi. 2026. “Dark Patterns and Consumer Vulnerability.” Behavioural Public Policy 10 (4): 798–847. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Nur, Wawan Susanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
















