SUHRAWARDI’S ONTOLOGY: FROM “ESSENCE-EXISTENCE” TO “LIGHT”

(A Suhrawardian Reply to Sadrian Critiques)

Authors

  • Mohammad Syifa Amin Widigdo Department of Religious Studies Indiana University-Bloomington, USA

Keywords:

Essence, Quiddity (mahiyyah), Existence (wujūd), Fundamentality/Primacy, Respectivality (mental concept)

Abstract

The distinction between essence (mahiyyah) and existence (wujūd) has been a consuming problem among philosophers, at least since al-Farabi and ibn Sina. It has become the starting point in reinterpretation of reality, whether objective or merely subjective, the problem of fundamentality (principal) and respectivality (mental conception) in the realms of ontology and epistemology which never been discussed specifically before. Suhrawardi is one of philosophers who tries to provide different interpretation and even critiques toward previous philosophers (especially ibn Sina) in this regard. Even though he supports ibn Sina’s point of view that there is distinction between essence and existence, but he also has his own conclusion in this case whichis formulated in his theory of “light”. This article tries to present the ideas of Suhrawardi on “essence and existence” and the theory of light. Here will be discussed also some critiques from Sadrian school and the answers to those critiques by Suhrawardian philosophers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Widigdo, M. S. A. . (2014). SUHRAWARDI’S ONTOLOGY: FROM “ESSENCE-EXISTENCE” TO “LIGHT”: (A Suhrawardian Reply to Sadrian Critiques). Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 4(2), 117–126. Retrieved from https://journal.sadra.ac.id/ojs/index.php/kanz/article/view/76

Issue

Section

Articles