IBN SĪNĀ AND IBN RUSHD’S CONCEPTIONS OF THE SOUL IN LIGHT OF ARISTOTLE’S THEORY OF FOUR CAUSES

Authors

  • Müfit Selim Saruhan Ankara University, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v11i2.434

Keywords:

Four Causes, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Sīnā, Islamic Philosophy, Soul

Abstract

This article undertakes a comparative study of Ibn Sīnā and Ibn Rushd’s conceptions of the soul through the framework of Aristotle’s four causes: material, formal, efficient, and final. Both thinkers draw deeply from Aristotelian psychology, yet their approaches diverge due to different metaphysical and theological commitments. Ibn Sīnā, shaped by Neoplatonic currents, presents the soul as an immaterial, self-subsistent substance that transcends the body and seeks perfection in union with the Active Intellect. This union is achieved through rational contemplation, ethical purification, and intellectual ascent, granting the soul an independent and eternal telos. By contrast, Ibn Rushd interprets the soul in strict continuity with Aristotle’s naturalism, emphasizing its inseparability from the body as its form and actuality. For him, human perfection is realized not in metaphysical transcendence but in civic virtue, rational engagement, and intellectual cultivation within empirical life. The article applies Aristotle’s four causes to their respective models, exploring the ontological, epistemological, and ethical implications of each framework. It further situates their perspectives within broader debates on consciousness, personhood, and moral responsibility, highlighting the enduring relevance of their insights. The study argues that re-examining these classical Islamic philosophies provides valuable resources for contemporary discussions in the philosophy of mind, ethics, and metaphysics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamson, Peter, and Fedor Benevich. 2018. “The Thought Experimental Method: Avicenna’s Flying Man Argument.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (2): 147–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.2.

Annas, Julia. 1982. “Aristotle on Inefficient Causes.” Philosophical Quarterly 32: 311–26.

Aristotle. 1993. De Anima. Edited by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arroisi, Jarman, and Rahmat Ardi Nur Rifa Da’i. 2019. “Konsep Jiwa Perspektif Ibn Sīnā.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 13 (2): 256–78. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2019.13.2.323-345.

Averroes. 1987. Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence). Translated with introduction and notes by Simon van den Bergh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Batak, Kemal. 2024. “Averroesian Religious Common Sense Natural Theology as Reflective Knowledge in the Form of Teleological Argument.” Religions 15 (12): 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121429.

Belo, Catarina. 2023. “Avicenna’s Theory of Science: Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology.” Journal of Islamic Studies 34 (3): 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etad019.

Bertolacci, Amos. 2006. The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ. Leiden: Brill.

———. 2007. “Avicenna and Averroes on the Proof of God’s Existence and the Subject Matter of Metaphysics.” Medioevo 32: 61–98.

Charles, David. 2001. “Teleological Causation in the Physics.” In Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, edited by L. Judson, 101–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davidson, Herbert A. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elzamzamy, Khalid, Rasha K. Bader, and Fikriye Bilge Bircan. 2024. “Contemporary Scholarship on Classical Islamic Psychology: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Muslim Mental Health 18 (1): 3–45. https://doi.org/10.3998/jmmh.6025.

Fakhry, Majid. 1958. Islamic Occasionalism and Its Critique by Averroës and Aquinas. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Gallagher, Shaun. 2023. “Minimal Self-Consciousness and the Flying Man Argument.” Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1296656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1296656.

Gutas, Dimitri. 2014. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Leiden: Brill.

Harvey, Elon. 2019. “Avicenna’s Influence on Maimonides’ Epistle on Astrology.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 29 (2): 171–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095742391900002X.

Hennig, Boris. 2022. “Avicenna on Human Self-Intellection.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 32 (2): 179–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423922000029.

Hyman, Arthur. 1965. “Aristotle’s First Matter and Avicenna’s and Averroes’ ‘Corporeal Form’.” In Harry Austryn Wolfson Jubilee Volume: On the Occasion of His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, edited by Saul Lieberman.Jerusalem: American Academy for Jewish Research.

Rushd, Ibn. 1954. Tafsīr Kitāb al-Nafs. Edited by A. F. Al-Ahwānī. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif.

Sīnā, Ibn. 1975. Al-Shifā’: Kitāb al-Nafs. Edited by Fazlur Rahman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ivry, A. L. 1979. “Averroes on Causation.” In Studies in Jewish Religious and Intellectual History: Presented to Alexander Altmann, edited by Siegfried Stein and Raphael Loewe. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Kaukua, Jari. 2020. “The Flying and the Masked Man, One More Time: Comments on Peter Adamson and Fedor Benevich.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6 (3): 285–96.

Kılıç, Muhammet Fatih. 2017. “İbn Sînâ’da Sudûrun Mantığı: Sebeplik–Sudûr İlişkisi Hakkında Bir İnceleme.” Şarkiyat 9 (2): 40–58.

Lala, Ismail, and Reham Alwazzan. 2023. “Transcendental Happiness in the Thought of Ibn Sīnā and Ibn ‘Arabī.” Religions 14 (6): 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060729.

Langermann, Y. Tzvi. 2009. Avicenna and His Legacy: A Golden Age of Science and Philosophy. Turnhout: Brepols.

Leaman, Oliver. 1998. Averroes and His Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Lizzini, Olga. 2013. “Causality as Relation: Avicenna (and al-Ghazālī).” Quaestio 13: 165–95.

López-Farjeat, Luis Xavier. 2015. “Causality in Islamic Philosophy.” In The Routledge Companion to Islamic Philosophy, edited by Richard C. Taylor and Luis Xavier López-Farjeat, 13–141. London: Routledge.

Maulana, Muhammad Irfan. 2024. “Filsafat Jiwa Ibnu Rusyd: Potensi Diri Tak Terbatas.” Tanwir: Journal of Islamic Civilization 1 (1): 130–52.

McGinnis, Jon. 2010. Avicenna. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rahman, Fazlur. 1952. Avicenna’s Psychology: An English Translation of Kitāb al-Nafs with Historical and Philosophical Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ramin, Fatemeh. 2024. “The Definition of Life and Death from the View of Avicenna.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 13 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102424.

Reece, Bryan C. 2024. “Colloquium 1: Theophrastus on Intellect in Aristotle’s De Anima.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 38 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134417-00381p02.

Richardson, Kara. 2013. “Avicenna’s Conception of the Efficient Cause.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2): 220–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.693065.

Salabi, Agus Salim. 2021. “Konstruksi Keilmuan Islam (Studi Pemikiran Ibnu Rusyd Tentang Ontologi dan Epistimologi).” ITQAN: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan 12 (1): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.47766/itqan.v12i1.188.

Saruhan, Müfit Selim. 2002. “Ahlak Felsefemizde İyi ve Kötünün Sebepleri.” İslami Araştırmalar 15 (4): 543–58.

Taufik, Muhammad, Jaffary Awang, Muhammad Zainal Abidin, and Khairiyanto. 2023. “Examining Ibn Sīnā’s and Suhrawardī’s Notion of the Soul: Reflections on Their Philosophical Contributions in the Modern Context.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 24 (1): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v24i1.4330.

Wisnovsky, Robert. 2003. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

How to Cite

Saruhan, M. S. (2025). IBN SĪNĀ AND IBN RUSHD’S CONCEPTIONS OF THE SOUL IN LIGHT OF ARISTOTLE’S THEORY OF FOUR CAUSES. Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 11(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v11i2.434

Issue

Section

Articles