HERMENEUTICS SITUATION AS THE PHILOSOPHIZING METHOD OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER AND ITS RELEVANCE TO SOCIAL RESEARCH

Abstract

Applying natural science methodologies to the social sciences causes a crisis in science. A crisis of science means the narrowing of researcher subjectivity so the possibility of research heuristics is drastically reduced. Martin Heidegger a philosopher of existentialism tried to solve this problem by developing a method that integrated schools of phenomenology and hermeneutics. This research aims to describe the hermeneutics situation method which embodies the two things above. This research is a type of library research that is descriptive and qualitative. The important value and novelty of this research is that it examines the closeness of philosophy and social science through Martin Heidegger’s way of thinking. A researcher does not live in isolation, he is connected to the context of life in which he lives. The context of life motivates researchers to see the meaning of something. In social research, researchers do not just meet social facts, but meet appropriate events (ereignis). So, social researchers are advised to avoid two things when conducting social research in the context of hermeneutics situation, namely the principle of subject-object division and the value-free principle. The reason is a presumption that a researcher was involved in the surrounding environment which then becomes the object of his research, even before conducting the research. This involvement is what makes the researcher able to understand the object of his research.

References

Alwi HS, Muhammad, Siti Robikah, and Iin Parninsih. 2021. “Reinterpretation of the Term Al-Nas (QS. Al-Hujurat 13) in Relation to the Social Aspects of Human and Homo Sapiens.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 22 (2): 489–504. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2021.2202-11.

Amirulloh, Muhammad. 2020. “Zoon Politicon Menjadi Zoom Politicon?” Jurnal RechtsVinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Aristoteles. 2017. Politik (La Politica). Translated by Syamsur Irawan Kharie. Yogyakarta: Narasi.

Arsyam, Muhammad, Kusnadi Umar, and Zakirah. 2020. “Manusia Sebagai Pendidik Perpektif Islam dan Barat.” OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/rgkvy.

Asriadi, Asriadi. 2017. “Masalah Kelangkaan dalam Kerangka Ekonomi Islam.” Jurnal Iqtisaduna 3 (2): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtisaduna.v3i2.4040.

Aulia, Adellia Rosita, Masduki Asbari, and Gunawan Santoso. 2023. “Hakikat Manusia Sebagai Homo Faber.” Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif 2 (1): 68–73. https://doi.org/10.9000/jupetra.v2i1.22.

Camere, Colin F., and Ernst Fehr. 2006. “‘When Does Economic Man’ Dominate Social Behaviour?” Science 31 (57): 47–56.

Clark, Mary E. 2002. In Search of Human Nature. London: Routledge.

Dermawan, Mohammad Kemal. 2018. “Perilaku Merusak Lingkungan Hidup: Perspektif Individu, Organisasi dan Institusional.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 6 (1): 73–102. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v6i1.312.

Dupre, John. 2002. Human Nature and the Limits of Science (Chapter I & II). University of Exeter.

Effendi, Winda Roselina. 2017. “Konsep Wellfare State di Indoneisa.” Jurnal Trias Politika 1 (1): 171–83. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v1i1.722.

Harari, Yuval Noah. 2011. Sapiens : A Brief History of Humankind. London: Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing.

Hobbes, Thomas. n.d. Leviathan. New York: Cambridge: University Press.

Horodecka, Anna. 2015. “The Field of Evolutionary and Neoclassical Economics as a Consequence of the Changes in Concepts of Human Nature.” Journal of International Studies 8 (1): 126–37. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/11.

———. 2017. “The Methodology of Evolutionary and Neoclassical Economics as a Consequence of the Changes in the Concept of Human Nature.” Argumenta Oeconomica 39 (2): 129–66. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2017.2.06.

Jaenudin, Riswan. 2018. “Konsep ‘Manusia Ekonomi’ dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Pendidikan.” Jurnal PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi 1 (1): 78–83. https://doi.org/10.36706/jp.v1i1.5515.

Kurniawati, Eka, and Nurhasanah Bakhtiar. 2018. “Manusia Menurut Konsep Al-Qur`an dan Sains.” Journal of Natural Science and Integration 1 (1): 78–94. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v1i1.5198.

Laughlin, J. Laurence. 2009. Principles of Political Economy by John Stuart Mill. New York: D. Appleton And Company.

Locke, John. 1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Dorset Court.

Marinescu, Ada. 2015. “Human Nature in the Economic Behavior Based on the Neoclassical Economic Model.” Theoretical and Applied Economics Bucharest University of Economic Studies 23 (4): 1–145.

Mas’ud, Fuad. 2017. Manajemen Bisnis Berbasis Pandangan Hidup Islam (Islamic Worldview-Based Business Management). Semarang: UNDIP Press.

McGregor, Douglas. 1960. The Human Side of Enterprises. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Meramveliotakis, Giorgos, and Manolis Manioudis. 2021. “History, Knowledge, and Sustainable Economic Development : The Contribution of John Stuart Mill’s Grand Stage Theory.” Sustainability 13 (1468). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031468.

Moore, Virginia. 1942. “Human Nature According to Saint Thomas Aquinas.” Thesis, Chicago: Loyola University Chicago. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/665.

Namang, Raimundus Bulet. 2020. “Negara dan Warga Negara Perspektif Aristoteles.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial 4 (2): 247–66. https://doi.org/10.38043/jids.v4i2.2449.

Nasr, Sayyed Hossein. 1968. Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. London: Allen and Unwin.

———. 2001. Islam and the Plight of Modern Man. Chicago: ABC International Group.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 1996. Religion and the Order of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.

Othman, Mohd Yusof, Faszly Rahim, Wan Nasyrudin Wan Abdullah, and Aulia Rahman Zulkarnain. 2018. “Evolusi Konsep Manusia dalam Tasawur Barat: Evolution of Human Concepts in Western Tasawur.” Sains Insani 3 (3): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol3no3.68.

Özgür, M. Erdem. 2009. “John Stuart Mill’de Adalet ve Mülkiyet.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64 (03): 149–65. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002116.

Penaskovic, Richard. 1980. “The Human Person: A Study in Paradox.” Melita Theologia 31 (2): 1–9.

Purnomo, Agus. 2015. “Islam dan Konsep Welfare State dalam Ekonomi Islam.” Al-Iqtishadiyah: Ekonomi Syariah Dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 2 (2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.31602/iqt.v2i2.378.

Random House. 2008. The Random House Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Random House.

Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt. 2020. “Is Economic Theory Wrong about Human Nature?” Journal of Economic and Social Policy 10 (2): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.200609132.

Reill, Peter Hanns, and Ellen Judy Wilson. 2004. Encyclopedia of The Enlightenment. New York: Facts on File, Inc.

Saihu, Saihu. 2019. “Konsep Manusia dan Implementasinya dalam Perumusan Tujuan Pendidikan Islam Menurut Murtadha Muthahhari.” Andragogi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 1 (2): 197–217. https://doi.org/10.36671/andragogi.v1i2.54.

Santosa, Tomi Apra Santosa. 2020. “Eksistensi Homo Neandertal dan Homo Sapiens Sapiens dalam Perspektif Sains dan Al-Qur’an.” Journal of Islamic Civilization 2 (2): 108–15. https://doi.org/10.33086/jic.v2i2.1683.

Sivakumar, K.S. 2018. “The Crisis of Economic Man (Homo Economicus).” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 8 (1): 51–54.

Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Edwin Cannan. London: Methuen and Co., Ltd.

Soenjoto, Arie Rachmat. 2018. “Strategi Kebijakan Pembangunan Ekonomi dalam Perspektif Islam (Studi Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran Ekonomi Neo Klasik).” Islamic Economics Journal 4 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.21111/iej.v4i1.2896.

Somit, Albert, and Steven A. Peterson. 2003. From Human Nature to Public Policy. New York: Plagrave.

Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1959. Individuals; An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.

Stringer, Christopher Brian, and Laura Tabitha Buck. 2014. “Diagnosing Homo Sapiens in the Fossil Record.” Annals of Human Biology 41 (4): 312–22. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2014.922616.

Sullivan, Jeremiah J. 1986. “Human Nature, Organizations, and Management Theory.” The Academy of Management Review 11 (3): 534–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/258309.

Susilo. 2003. “Kerusakan Lingkungan Akibat Usaha/Kegiatan Pertambangan.” Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 2003.

Syaifullah, M. Tamim, and Asfi Manzilati. 2015. “Analisis Pemenuhan Kebutuhan dan Penyelesaian Kelangkaan Sumber Daya Air (Studi Kasus Kelurahan Tlogowaru, Malang).” Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Pembangunan 15 (1): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.20961/jiep.v15i1.9892.

Tomer, John F. 2001. “Economic Man vs. Heterodox Men: The Concepts of Human Nature in Schools of Economic Thought.” Journal of Socio-Economics 30 (4): 281–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00100-7.

Verschuren, P., and H. Doorwaard. 2005. Designing a Research Project. Utrecht: Lemma.

Wang, Stephen. 2007. “Aquinas on Human Happiness and the Natural Desire for God.” New Blackfriars 88 (1015): 322–34.

Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy. 2013. “Worldview Islam dan Kapitalisme Barat.” Tsaqafah 9 (1): 15–38. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v9i1.36.